Calving front stress boundary condition

Notation

Variable

Meaning

h

ice top surface elevation

b

ice bottom surface elevation

H=hb

ice thickness

g

acceleration due to gravity

ν

vertically-averaged viscosity of ice

n

normal vector

B(T)

ice hardness

D

strain rate tensor

de

effective strain rate

t

Cauchy stress tensor

tD

deviatoric stress tensor; note tijD=tij+pδij

Calving front stress boundary condition

In the 3D case the calving front stress boundary condition ([55], equation (6.19)) reads

t|cfn=pwatern.

Expanded in component form, and evaluating the left-hand side at the calving front and assuming that the calving front face is vertical (nz=0), this gives

(txxDp)nx+txyDny=pwaternx,txyDnx+(tyyDp)ny=pwaterny,txzDnx+tyzDny=0.

Because we seek boundary conditions for the SSA stress balance, in which the vertically-integrated forms of the stresses txxD,txyD,tyyD are balanced separately from the shear stresses txzD,tyzD, the third of the above equations can be omitted from the remaining analysis.

Let pice=ρiceg(hz). In the hydrostatic approximation, tzz=pice ([55], equation (5.59)). Next, since tD has trace zero,

p=ptxxDtyyDtzzD=tzztxxDtyyD=picetxxDtyyD.

Thus

(60)(2txxD+tyyD)nx+txyDny=(picepwater)nx,txyDnx+(2tyyD+txxD)ny=(picepwater)ny.

Now, using the “viscosity form” of the flow law

tD=2νD,ν=12B(T)de1/n1

and the fact that in the shallow shelf approximation u and v are depth-independent, we can define the membrane stress N as the vertically-integrated deviatoric stress

Nij=bhtijDdz=2ν¯HDij.

Here ν¯ is the vertically-averaged effective viscosity.

Integrating (60) with respect to z, we get

(61)(2Nxx+Nyy)nx+Nxyny=bh(picepwater)dznx,Nxynx+(2Nyy+Nxx)ny=bh(picepwater)dzny.

Shallow shelf approximation

The shallow shelf approximation written in terms of Nij is

(62)x(2Nxx+Nyy)+Nxyy=ρgHhx,Nxyx+y(2Nyy+Nxx)=ρgHhy.

Implementing the calving front boundary condition

We use centered finite difference approximations in the discretization of the SSA (62). Consider the first equation:

(63)x(2Nxx+Nyy)+Nxyy=ρgHhx.

Let F~ be an approximation of F using a finite-difference scheme. Then the first SSA equation is approximated by

1Δx((2N~xx+N~yy)i+12,j(2N~xx+N~yy)i12,j)+1Δy((N~xy)i,j+12(N~xy)i,j12)=ρgHhi+12,jhi12,jΔx.

Now, assume that the cell boundary (face) at i+12,j is at the calving front. Then n=(1,0) and from (61) we have

(64)2Nxx+Nyy=bh(picepwater)dz.

We call the right-hand side of (64) the “pressure difference term.”

In forming the matrix approximation of the SSA [10], [17], instead of assembling a matrix row corresponding to the generic equation (63) we use

1Δx([bh(picepwater)dz]i+12,j(2N~xx+N~yy)i12,j)+1Δy((N~xy)i,j+12(N~xy)i,j12)=ρgHhi+12,jhi12,jΔx.

Moving terms that do not depend on the velocity field to the right-hand side, we get

1Δx((2N~xx+N~yy)i12,j)+1Δy((N~xy)i,j+12(N~xy)i,j12)=ρgHhi+12,jhi12,jΔx+[bh(pwaterpice)dzΔx]i+12,j.

The second equation and other cases (n=(1,0), etc) are treated similarly.


Previous Up Next